>> LD_PRELOAD works as described, though the source says its not to be documented > >Of course the source says not to document it. Its a major security hole and as >we know, security holes are hushed up. > >-ken LD_PRELOAD is no more of a security hole than LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Besides, it *is* documented in Solaris 2.x: LD_PRELOAD A list of shared objects that are to be interpreted by the dynamic linker at run time. The specified shared objects are linked in after the program being executed and before any other shared objects that the program references.